Prevalence and management of dyslipidemia in primary care practices in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of dyslipidemia and to describe its management in Canadian primary care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using primary care electronic medical record data. SETTING: Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 40 years or older who saw a Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network contributor between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence or absence of dyslipidemia as identified by a validated case definition and the treatment status of patients identified as having dyslipidemia based on having been prescribed a lipid-lowering agent (LLA). RESULTS: In total, 50.0% of the 773,081 patients 40 years of age or older who had had a primary care visit in 2018 or 2019 were identified as having dyslipidemia. Dyslipidemia was more prevalent in patients 65 or older (61.5%), in males (56.7%) versus females (44.7%), and in those living in urban areas (50.0%) versus rural areas (45.2%). In patients with documented dyslipidemia, 42.8% had evidence of treatment with an LLA. Stratifying patients by Framingham risk score revealed that those in the high-risk category were more likely to have been prescribed an LLA (65.0%) compared with those in the intermediate-risk group (48.7%) or the low-risk group (22.8%). The strongest determinants of receiving LLA treatment for dyslipidemia include sex, with males being 1.95 times more likely to have been treated compared with females (95% CI 1.91 to 1.98; P<.0001); and body mass index, with those with obesity having a significantly increased likelihood of being treated with an LLA (adjusted odds ratio of 1.36, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.41; P<.0001). CONCLUSION: This study provides an updated look at the prevalence and treatment of dyslipidemia among Canadians. Half of patients aged 40 years or older have dyslipidemia, with an even higher prevalence observed among adults aged 65 years or older, males, and those with obesity or other chronic conditions. There are still gaps in treatment among those with documented dyslipidemia, principally among those calculated to have high or intermediate Framingham risk scores. Particular attention should also be paid to those at higher risk for not receiving treatment, including female patients and those within normal body mass index ranges.

Introducing change management education program for family medicine residents: a demonstration project.

Implication Statement: The project presents an innovative mixed learning approach program to provide basic change management training for family medicine residents. Developed by a team of faculty experts in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Manitoba, this three-to-four-hour training program provided residents an understanding of an approach to change management that systematically plans, implements, and evaluates new initiatives in healthcare settings. Students reported that change management is important for their success as healthcare professionals. This program could easily be replicated. Énoncé des implications de la recherche: Ce projet consiste en programme novateur fondé sur une approche d'apprentissage mixte visant à offrir une formation de base en gestion du changement aux résidents en médecine familiale. Élaborée par une équipe de professeurs experts du département de médecine familiale de l'Université du Manitoba, cette formation d'une durée de trois à quatre heures a permis aux résidents de se familiariser avec une approche de la gestion du changement qui consiste à planifier, à mettre en œuvre et à évaluer systématiquement de nouvelles initiatives en milieu clinique. Les étudiants estiment que la gestion du changement est un facteur important pour leur réussite en tant que professionnels de la santé. Ce programme peut aisément être reproduit ailleurs.

Validation of a Case Definition to Identify Patients Diagnosed With Cardiovascular Disease in Canadian Primary Care Practices.

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death globally. This study validates a primary care-based electronic medical record case definition for CVD. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study explores electronic medical record data from 1574 primary care providers participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network. A reference standard was created by reviewing medical records of a subset of patients in this network (n = 2017) for coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CeVD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Together, these data produced a CVD reference. We applied validated case definitions to an active patient population (≥ 1 visit between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019) to estimate prevalence using the exact binomial test (N = 689,301). Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, and t tests characterized patients with vs without CVD. Results: The optimal CVD Case Definition 2 had a sensitivity of 68.5% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 61.6%-74.8%), a specificity of 97.8% (95% CI: 97.0%-98.4%), a positive predictive value of 77.7% (95% CI: 71.6%-82.7%), and a negative predictive value of 96.5% (95% CI: 95.8%-97.1%). Included in this CVD definition was a strong CAD case definition with sensitivity of 91.6% (95% CI: 84.6%-96.1%), specificity of 98.3% (95% CI: 97.6%-98.8%), a PPV of 74.8% (95% CI: 67.8%-80.7%), and an NPV of 99.5% (95% CI: 99.1%-99.7%). This CVD definition also included CeVD and PVD case definitions with low sensitivity (77.6% and 36.6%) but high specificity (98.6% and 99.0%). The estimated prevalence of CVD among primary care patients is 11.2% (95% CI, 11.1%-11.3%; n = 77,064); the majority had CAD (6.4%). Conclusions: This study validated a definition of CVD and its component parts-CAD, CeVD, and PVD. Understanding the prevalence and disease burden for patients with CVD within primary care settings can improve prevention and disease management.

Contexte: La maladie cardiovasculaire (MCV) est l'une des premières causes de décès dans le monde. Cette étude valide une définition de cas dans les dossiers médicaux électroniques en soins primaires pour la MCV. Méthodologie: Cette étude intersectionnelle rétrospective explore les données provenant des dossiers médicaux électroniques de 1 574 fournisseurs de soins primaires participant au Réseau canadien de surveillance sentinelle en soins primaires. Une norme de référence a été créée en vérifiant les dossiers médicaux d'un sous-ensemble de patients dans ce réseau (n = 2017) à la recherche d'une coronaropathie, d'une maladie cérébrovasculaire ou d'une maladie vasculaire périphérique. Ensemble, ces données ont produit une référence pour la MCV. Nous avons appliqué des définitions de cas validées à une population de patients actifs (≥ 1 consultation entre le 1er janvier 2018 et le 31 décembre 2019) pour estimer la prévalence à l'aide du test binomial exact (N = 689 301). Des statistiques descriptives, des tests de χ2, et des tests t ont permis de caractériser les patients atteints ou non de MCV. Résultats: La définition de cas no 2 optimale pour la MCV avait une sensibilité de 68,5 % (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : de 61,6 à 74,8 %), une spécificité de 97,8 % (IC à 95 % : de 97,0 à 98,4 %), une valeur prédictive positive de 77,7 % (IC à 95 % : de 71,6 à 82,7 %) et une valeur prédictive négative de 96,5 % (IC à 95 % : de 95,8 à 97,1 %). On a inclus à cette définition de MCV une définition d'un cas de coronaropathie puissante, avec une sensibilité de 91,6 % (IC à 95 % : de 84,6 à 96,1 %), une spécificité de 98,3 % (IC à 95 % : de 97,6 à 98,8 %), une valeur prédictive positive de 74,8 % (IC à 95 % : de 67,8 à 80,7 %) et une valeur prédictive négative de 99,5 % (IC à 95 % : de 99,1 à 99,7 %). Cette définition de la MCV incluait aussi des cas de maladie cérébrovasculaire et de maladie vasculaire périphérique ayant une faible sensibilité (77,6 % et 36,6 %), mais une spécificité élevée (98,6 % et 99,0 %). La prévalence estimée de la MCV parmi les patients en soins primaires est de 11,2 % (IC à 95 % : de 11,1 à 11,3 %; n = 77 064); la majorité présentant une coronaropathie (6,4 %). Conclusions: Cette étude validait une définition de la MCV et de ses composantes ­ coronaropathie, maladie cérébrovasculaire et maladie vasculaire périphérique. Une compréhension de la prévalence et du fardeau de la maladie pour les patients atteints de MCV en soins primaires peut améliorer la prévention et la prise en charge de cette maladie.

Psychiatric consultation: Characteristics, satisfaction, and perceived opportunities among referrers to a 1-time service.

OBJECTIVE: To further understand and optimize primary care provider (PCP) referrals to a 1-time psychiatric consultation service by developing profiles of PCP referrers, assessing PCP satisfaction with the service, and determining intervention opportunities. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a referral database and subsequent cross-sectional survey of referrers. SETTING: Winnipeg, Man. PARTICIPANTS: All family physicians who had made at least 1 referral in 2017 to the Centralized Psychiatric Consultation Service for Adults, a 1-time consultation service. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Referral frequency, individual and practice characteristics, satisfaction with the Centralized Psychiatric Consultation Service for Adults, and subjective drivers of referral activity were assessed. Interest in a range of intervention opportunities to increase mental health knowledge and support were also examined. RESULTS: Of the 403 family physicians who referred patients to the consultation service in 2017, a total of 111 (27.5%) responded to the survey. Among all referrers, 287 (71.2%) were low referrers (1 to 4 referrals), 65 (16.1%) were moderate referrers (5 to 9 referrals), and 51 (12.7%) were high referrers (≥10 referrals). Solo practice (P=.04) and no access to collaborative mental health services (P<.001) were significantly associated with being a high referrer. Roughly 26.3% of low referrers, 29.2% of moderate referrers, and 15.4% of high referrers were satisfied with wait times for the service. Higher referrers did not identify a lack of comfort with providing psychiatric care as a driver of referrals; more indicated that they had a high volume of patients with mental health needs, that there was a lack of access to alternative services, and that patients sometimes requested referral. Overall, more than 40% of respondents expressed interest in a mental health care navigator, hard-copy resource information, and rapid access to consultation advice via telephone or an electronic platform. There was less interest in other proposed interventions. CONCLUSION: We found referrers to the Centralized Psychiatric Consultation Service for Adults to be clustered based on specific practice characteristics, as well as provider-patient factors. Overall, satisfaction with the service was fair and PCPs were not highly interested in a variety of proposed interventions. Future studies should explore how useful 1-time consultation services are for solo-practising PCPs and how best to support these and other PCPs in their management of patients with mental health needs.

Approach to atrial fibrillation: Essentials for primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To support family physicians in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients at risk and in identifying and managing those with established AF; and to summarize key recommendations for ideal screening and care of patients. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Rhythm Society comprehensive guidelines for the management of AF, based on current evidence and clinical experience related to AF. MAIN MESSAGE: Atrial fibrillation, which is estimated to affect at least 500,000 Canadians, is associated with high risks of stroke, heart failure, and death. Primary care clinicians occupy a central role in the management of this chronic condition, focusing on the challenges of preventing AF and identifying, diagnosing, treating, and following patients with AF. Evidence-based guidelines that provide optimal management strategies have been published by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Rhythm Society to assist in these tasks. Messages critical to primary care are offered to support effective knowledge translation. CONCLUSION: Most patients with AF can be managed effectively in primary care. Family physicians not only play an important role in ensuring patients with AF receive timely diagnoses, but they are also key to providing initial and ongoing care, especially in patients with comorbid conditions.

Primary medication nonadherence in a large primary care population: Observational study from Manitoba.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze primary medication nonadherence across several prescription indications and test the predictors of drug nonadherence in an adult primary care population. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study using primary care provider prescriptions linked to pharmacy-based dispensing data from 2012 to 2014. SETTING: Manitoba. PARTICIPANTS: Patients in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of primary medication nonadherence by drug class. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test the associations of patient demographic and clinical or provider characteristics with primary medication nonadherence. The C statistic was used to assess the models' discriminative performance. RESULTS: A total of 91,660 unique prescriptions were assessed from a cohort of more than 200,000 patients. Primary medication nonadherence ranged from 13.7% (antidepressants) to 30.3% (antihypertensives). In conditions that typically present symptomatically (eg, infections, anxiety) nonadherence ranged from 13.7% to 17.5%. The range was 21.2% to 30.0% for medications related to asymptomatic conditions or those typically detected by screening. The discriminative performance of the models based on patient demographic, clinical, or provider characteristics was weak. CONCLUSION: Primary medication nonadherence is common, occurring more often in asymptomatic conditions. The poor predictability of the models suggests that caution is required when considering characteristic-based interventions or prediction tools to improve primary medication nonadherence.

PEER simplified chronic pain guideline: Management of chronic low back, osteoarthritic, and neuropathic pain in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinical practice guideline to support the management of chronic pain, including low back, osteoarthritic, and neuropathic pain in primary care. METHODS: The guideline was developed with an emphasis on best available evidence and shared decision-making principles. Ten health professionals (4 generalist family physicians, 1 pain management-focused family physician, 1 anesthesiologist, 1 physical therapist, 1 pharmacist, 1 nurse practitioner, and 1 psychologist), a patient representative, and a nonvoting pharmacist and guideline methodologist comprised the Guideline Committee. Member selection was based on profession, practice setting, and lack of financial conflicts of interest. The guideline process was iterative in identification of key questions, evidence review, and development of guideline recommendations. Three systematic reviews, including a total of 285 randomized controlled trials, were completed. Randomized controlled trials were included only if they reported a responder analysis (eg, how many patients achieved a 30% or greater reduction in pain). The committee directed an Evidence Team (composed of evidence experts) to address an additional 11 complementary questions. Key recommendations were derived through committee consensus. The guideline and shared decision-making tools underwent extensive review by clinicians and patients before publication. RECOMMENDATIONS: Physical activity is recommended as the foundation for managing osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain; evidence of benefit is unclear for neuropathic pain. Cognitive-behavioural therapy or mindfulness-based stress reduction are also suggested as options for managing chronic pain. Treatments for which there is clear, unclear, or no benefit are outlined for each condition. Treatments for which harms likely outweigh benefits for all or most conditions studied include opioids and cannabinoids. CONCLUSION: This guideline for the management of chronic pain, including osteoarthritis, low back pain, and neuropathic pain, highlights best available evidence including both benefits and harms for a number of treatment interventions. A strong recommendation for exercise as the primary treatment for chronic osteoarthritic and low back pain is made based on demonstrated long-term evidence of benefit. This information is intended to assist with, not dictate, shared decision making with patients.

Lignes directrices simplifiées de PEER sur la douleur chronique: Gestion de la douleur chronique lombaire, arthrosique et neuropathique en première ligne.

OBJECTIF: Formuler des lignes directrices de pratique clinique pour soutenir la prise en charge de la douleur chronique, y compris la douleur lombaire, arthrosique et neuropathique, dans les soins primaires. MÉTHODES: Ces lignes directrices ont été élaborées en mettant l'accent sur les meilleures données probantes disponibles et sur les principes de décision partagée. Dix professionnels de la santé (4 omnipraticiens, 1 médecin de famille spécialisée en gestion de la douleur, 1 anesthésiste, 1 physiothérapeute, 1 pharmacienne, 1 infirmière praticienne et 1 psychologue), 1 représentant des patients, et 1 pharmacienne et spécialiste de la méthodologie des lignes directrices sans droit de vote composaient le comité des lignes directrices. Les membres ont été sélectionnés en fonction de leur profession, de leur milieu de pratique, et de l'absence d'un conflit d'intérêts de nature financière. Les lignes directrices sont le fruit d'un processus itératif incluant la détermination des questions clés, l'examen des données probantes et la formulation des recommandations des lignes directrices. Trois revues systématiques, totalisant 285 études avec répartition aléatoire et contrôlées ont été réalisées. Ces études n'étaient incluses que si elles avaient rapporté une analyse des répondants (p. ex. combien de patients ont obtenu un soulagement d'au moins 30% de la douleur). Le comité a confié à une équipe d'examen des données (composée de spécialistes des données probantes) la tâche de répondre à 11 autres questions complémentaires. Les principales recommandations découlent d'un consensus au sein du comité. Des cliniciens et des patients ont minutieusement examiné les lignes directrices et les outils de décision partagée avant leur publication. RECOMMANDATIONS: L'activité physique est recommandée comme fondement de la gestion de la douleur arthrosique et lombaire chronique; les données probantes étayant un bienfait ne sont pas concluantes dans le cas de la douleur neuropathique. La thérapie cognitivo-comportementale ou la réduction du stress basée sur la pleine conscience sont également suggérées comme des options pour gérer la douleur chronique. Les traitements pour lesquels le bienfait est clair, non concluant ou absent sont décrits sous chaque affection. Les traitements dont les préjudices surpassent probablement les bienfaits pour toutes les affections étudiées, ou la plupart d'entre elles, sont les opioïdes et les cannabinoïdes. CONCLUSION: Ces lignes directrices sur la gestion de la douleur chronique, y compris la douleur arthrosique, lombaire et neuropathique, met en lumière les meilleures données probantes disponibles, y compris les bienfaits et préjudices pour un certain nombre d'interventions thérapeutiques. Une forte recommandation en faveur de l'exercice comme principal traitement de la douleur arthrosique et lombaire chronique repose sur des données probantes ayant démontré un bienfait depuis longtemps. Cette information vise à contribuer au processus de décision partagée avec le patient et non à le dicter.

Estimation of Health and Economic Benefits of a Small Automatic External Defibrillator for Rapid Treatment of Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SMART): A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Background: Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) occurs in 0.4% of the general population and up to 6% or more of at-risk groups each year. Early CPR and defibrillation improves SCA outcomes but access to automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) remains limited. Methods: Markov models were used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a portable SMART (SMall AED for Rapid Treatment of SCA) approach to early SCA management over a life-time horizon in at-risk and not at-risk populations. Simulated patients (n = 600,000) who had not received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) were randomized to a SMART device with CPR prompts or non-SMART approaches. Annual SCA risk was varied from 0.2 to 3.5%. Analysis was performed in a US economy from both societal (SP) and healthcare (HP) perspectives to evaluate the number of SCA fatalities prevented by SMART, and SMART cost-effectiveness at a threshold of $100,000/Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). Results: A SMART approach was cost-effective when annual SCA risk exceeded 1.51% (SP) and 1.62% (HP). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were $95,251/QALY (SP) and $100,797/QALY (HP) at a 1.60% SCA annual risk. At a 3.5% annual SCA risk, SMART was highly cost-effective from both SP and HP [ICER: $53,925/QALY (SP), $59,672/QALY (HP)]. In microsimulation, SMART prevented 1,762 fatalities across risk strata (1.59% fatality relative risk reduction across groups). From a population perspective, SMART could prevent at least 109,839 SCA deaths in persons 45 years and older in the United States. Conclusions and Relevance: A SMART approach to SCA prophylaxis prevents fatalities and is cost-effective in patients at elevated SCA risk. The availability of a smart-phone enabled pocket-sized AED with CPR prompts has the potential to greatly improve population health and economic outcomes.

Increasing likelihood of prescribing recommended lipid management: Primary care providers' participation in cardiology continuing medical education.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether participation in a series of cardiology continuing medical education (CME) activities affects primary care providers' (PCPs') lipid management for their patients. DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used a database of participation in cardiology CME activities (2011 to 2017) linked to electronic medical records. Statistical analyses were completed using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations. SETTING: Manitoba. PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving care from 225 PCPs participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recommended lipid management was defined as prescription of statins (yes or no) among patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD), patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM; 40 years or older), and patients diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (CKD; 50 years and older) in 2017. Treatment was identified using the ATC (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical) system (ATC code C10AA or C10B). RESULTS: After adjusting for relevant confounders, the odds of prescribing statins to patients with CVD, DM, or CKD among PCPs who did not participate in the cardiology CME activities were 50%, 55%, and 67% lower, respectively, than among PCPs who participated in 2 or more activities. The odds of prescribing statins to patients with CVD and DM among PCPs who participated in only 1 cardiology CME activity were also 67% and 63% lower, respectively, than among PCPs who participated in 2 or more activities. CONCLUSION: Results suggested that PCPs who participated in 2 or more cardiology CME activities were more likely to prescribe recommended lipid management (statins) for adults with CVD, DM, or CKD.

Use of electronic medical records to describe the prevalence of allergic diseases in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Leveraging the data management resources of the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) is a viable approach for describing the prevalence of allergic disease documented in primary care settings. METHODS: The dataset used for this study was inclusive of data from EMR initiation up to Dec 31st 2018. The sample included 1235 primary care providers representing 1,556,472 patients across Canada. RESULTS: In total, there were 536,005 patients with a documented allergy that fit into one of the 10 suggested categories. The allergy table includes 718,032 distinct entries representing 564,242 unique patients, which is 36.3% of the patients within the CPCSSN repository. The most common allergies recorded were drug allergy (39.0%), beta-lactam allergy (14.4%), environmental allergy (11.0%), and food allergy (8.0%). Anticipated upcoming studies include physician-documented drug allergy with a focus on beta-lactam allergy, as well as stinging insect allergy, among others. To our knowledge, these will also be the first such prevalence studies of primary care physician-documented allergic disease done in Canada. INTERPRETATION: The CPCSSN dataset represents electronic medical records from 1.5 million patients across Canada including documentation of allergic diseases. This dataset provides a national representative population to describe and characterize Canadian patients with common allergic conditions. This robust dataset provides the opportunity for health surveillance, and in particular data to explore the impact of allergic disease on primary care practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

The Revenge of Unintended Consequences of Anaphylaxis-Risk Overdiagnosis: How Far We Have Come and How Far We Have to Go.

Overdiagnosis of anaphylaxis risk is an underappreciated aspect of anaphylaxis prevention. Whereas the benefits of anaphylaxis-risk prevention are well known, potential harms resulting from preemptive approaches to mitigate anaphylaxis-risk are not insignificant. Still, great progress has been made in recent years to avoid the unintended consequences of anaphylaxis-risk overdiagnosis. Reflection on recent advances in the use of diagnostic testing, as well as the application of diagnostic labels, provides an important perspective to understand how far the specialty of allergy and immunology has come in improving the lives of patients and families. Examples of recent paradigm shifts in anaphylaxis-risk management include approaches to peanut allergy prevention without screening, deferral of corticosteroids to prevent biphasic anaphylaxis reactions, reevaluation of reflex use of emergency medical services for resolved community anaphylaxis, and an approach to penicillin allergy delabeling with direct oral challenge. Routine medical practices to decrease anaphylaxis risk can have lifelong impacts for patients-beyond just preventing anaphylaxis. As our understanding of these trade-offs evolves, it becomes necessary to weigh both the benefits and the harms of past management approaches. Because medicine remains a science of uncertainty and an art of probability, a critical approach to risk mitigation remains necessary to find the often-elusive balance in anaphylaxis prevention.

Primary prescription adherence for obstructive lung disease in a primary care population.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine primary prescription adherence for obstructive lung diseases (e.g., asthma, COPD) in an adult primary care patient population over a 3-year period. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of electronic medical record and administrative data was performed to determine primary adherence, defined as dispensation of a new prescription within 90 days of the date the prescription was written. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test predictors of prescription primary adherence. RESULTS: Of 13,220 prescriptions for obstructive airway disease, 75.9% (N = 10,038) were filled. In multivariate analysis, depression, certain age groups (18-44 years), higher income quartile were associated with reduced prescription adherence. However, 1-2 ER visits in the previous year (compared to no ER visits), number of ambulatory visits in the previous year, and number of hospitalizations in the previous year, did not increase the likelihood of prescription adherence. INTERPRETATION: This study provides important insights about factors associated with prescription nonadherence and is the first study examining primary medication adherence with medications for obstructive lung disease in adults, providing indications of prescription nonadherence patterns among a broad population.

Primary care provider-reported prevalence of vaccine and polyethylene glycol allergy in Canada.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has highlighted the importance of accurate capture of vaccine, and vaccine component, allergy. There remains a gap in the prevalence literature from the perspective of direct primary care provider (PCP) reporting at a population level. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of PCP-documented vaccine and polyethylene glycol (PEG) allergy using electronic medical record data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network repository. Machine learning algorithms were applied to evaluate for vaccine allergy documentation, and Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical codes were used for PEG allergy or allergy to common injectable medications containing PEG (CIMCP). RESULTS: The prevalence of PCP-documented vaccine allergy in Canada was 0.037% (395/1,055,677) and of PEG allergy was 0.0009% (10/1,055,677). In total, 0.01% of patients had a documented allergy to either PEG or CIMCP (135/1,055,677). None of the patients with PEG allergy had a documented allergy to a CIMCP. Patients with vaccine allergy and PEG allergy were significantly more likely to have other atopic comorbidities, including asthma (P < .001 for both), eczema (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively), rhinitis (P = .002 and P < .001, respectively), and food allergy (P < .001 for both). Significantly higher rates of depression (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively) and anxiety (P = .003 and P < .001, respectively) were found in those with vaccine allergy, or PEG allergy, than those without vaccine allergy or PEG allergy. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to estimate the prevalence of vaccine and PEG allergy in a national cohort that uses PCP documentation, revealing a low reported rate of vaccine allergy and PEG allergy.